Diagnosis workspace
Your tools and credentials stay local. A client you control runs the checks; Tellagen records the focus question, working hypothesis, source audit, evidence gaps, and responder-approved next actions with the incident.
Public demo · Fictional data · Read-only
Static product preview
Review the fictional checks, evidence links, open gap, confidence rationale, and responder decision.
Frame
The Diagnosis path keeps the focus question, affected services, time window, playbook, confidence, and open questions visible. Follow-up required remains explicit when the available evidence cannot support a conclusion.
Inspect
The source audit records which sources ran, failed, or were unavailable. Findings keep attached evidence references, while lineage status marks those links matched, partial, or unmatched—so responders can review gaps before accepting a cause or next action.
Act
Accepted findings can become timeline events with their evidence links. Recommended follow-ups can become assigned incident actions, keeping diagnosis, mitigation, and the final review connected without automatic incident changes.
The outcome is not just a paragraph. Tellagen retains the investigation boundary, provenance, uncertainty, and reviewed response handoff.
Affected services, time window, selected runbook version, and source readiness define the investigation boundary.
Trace steps, source audit, checked evidence, gaps, and lineage show how the conclusion was formed.
Confidence, open questions, and follow-up required states stay visible beside the working hypothesis.
Reviewed findings move to the timeline and accepted recommendations become owned incident actions.
No. An MCP-capable client that you control picks up the diagnosis and uses its locally configured tools. Tellagen stores the run context and reviewable results, not your infrastructure credentials.
The client can use the tools available in its environment, such as Grafana, Kubernetes, GitHub, documentation, logs, and CLI integrations. Tellagen provides sanitized source metadata and records availability gaps when required access is missing.
No. Findings and recommended actions remain reviewable. A responder decides whether to promote a finding into the timeline or accept a recommended action.
Ready for the record
Keep the question, checked sources, missing evidence, conclusion, and approved next action reviewable together.